In 18 elite sprinters followed after a first hamstring strain while sprinting in competition, the main injury was in the outer hamstring muscle (the long head of biceps femoris) every time. Injuries that reached the upper tendon, or sat closer to the sitting bone on examination and imaging, took longer to get back to the previous level of performance.
Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A. "Acute first-time hamstring strains during high-speed running: a longitudinal study including clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings." Am J Sports Med 2007; 35(2): 197-206.
In 30 people from 21 sports whose hamstring strain happened in a position combining a deep hip bend with a straight knee, every injury sat high in the back of the thigh close to the sitting bone, and most involved the upper tendon of one hamstring muscle (semimembranosus). Nearly half gave up their sport, and for the 16 who returned, the typical time back was 31 weeks, ranging from 9 weeks to 2 years.
Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A. "Proximal hamstring strains of stretching type in different sports: injury situations, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics, and return to sport." Am J Sports Med 2008; 36(9): 1799-1804.
In 180 male athletes examined within five days of sudden pain at the back of the thigh, how bad the worst pain was, having to stop within five minutes, the length of the tender area and pain when bending the knee against resistance were each linked with the time to return to sport. Adding a magnetic resonance imaging scan barely improved that estimate. Return times varied widely, and the authors found no reason for a routine scan after a sudden hamstring injury.
Wangensteen A, Almusa E, Boukarroum S, et al. "MRI does not add value over and above patient history and clinical examination in predicting time to return to sport after acute hamstring injuries: a prospective cohort of 180 male athletes." Br J Sports Med 2015; 49(24): 1579-1587.
A clinical review describes proximal hamstring tendinopathy as deep buttock pain where the hamstrings attach to the sitting bone, affecting athletes and non-athletes, often long-standing and limiting sport and daily life. Evidence on its diagnosis and management is limited, and principles established for Achilles and patellar tendinopathy appear to apply but are less well documented for it.
Goom TS, Malliaras P, Reiman MP, Purdam CR. "Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: Clinical Aspects of Assessment and Management." J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46(6): 483-493.
A review of upper hamstring injuries reports that tendinopathy and partial tears can often be managed without surgery, with surgery kept for cases that do not respond. Complete tears managed without surgery often left weakness, reduced function and a poor return to sport, while surgical repair can give good strength and function, and early repair is preferred over a delayed one. A later randomised trial in adults aged 30 to 70, summarised below, found non-surgical care no worse than surgery for function at two years.
Degen RM. "Proximal Hamstring Injuries: Management of Tendinopathy and Avulsion Injuries." Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12(2): 138-146.
In 92 athletes, half with long-standing proximal hamstring tendinopathy, three tests that stretch the hamstring to bring on pain at the sitting bone (the Puranen-Orava, bent-knee stretch and modified bent-knee stretch tests) gave consistent results between and within examiners and identified the condition moderately to highly well, the modified bent-knee stretch test best. The authors advise using them alongside other measures, such as imaging.
Cacchio A, Borra F, Severini G, et al. "Reliability and validity of three pain provocation tests used for the diagnosis of chronic proximal hamstring tendinopathy." Br J Sports Med 2012; 46(12): 883-887.
A 2024 trial in Sweden and Norway randomised 119 adults aged 30 to 70 with a hamstring avulsion (tendon pulled off the sitting bone) to surgery or non-surgical treatment. At two years, function with non-surgical care was no worse than after surgery, and there were fewer adverse events (3 against 9).
Pihl E, Laszlo S, Rosenlund AM, et al. "Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsions." NEJM Evid 2024; 3(8): EVIDoa2400056.
In 100 people with proximal hamstring tendinopathy treated in primary care physiotherapy practices, six sessions of individualised physiotherapy or of shockwave, both with the same advice and education, gave similar results for overall change and function over a year.
Rich A, Ford J, Cook J, et al. "Physiotherapy Compared With Shockwave Therapy for the Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Am J Sports Med 2025; 53(14): 3396-3407.
A review of 78 studies covering 71,324 athletes found that a history of hamstring strain raised the risk of another (risk ratio 2.7), more so when it was recent (4.8), and the authors named older age and a previous strain as the strongest risk factors.
Green B, Bourne MN, van Dyk N, et al. "Recalibrating the risk of hamstring strain injury (HSI): A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for index and recurrent hamstring strain injury in sport." Br J Sports Med 2020; 54(18): 1081-1088.